Comparison
Zeke vs Hyros
~$499/mo entry → scales aggressively with ad spend, often reaching $2K–$10K+/mo at scale. No public standard tier list — per-account quotes.
Zeke vs Hyros.
Hyros tracks clicks across channels. Zeke recommends the action those clicks are asking for.
Attribution without a reporting layer is a better-looking spreadsheet. Zeke turns attribution signal into plain-English reports your team can review.
Positioning
Two different jobs
Most agencies use both — they own different layers of the stack.
Hyros is an attribution + tracking platform, historically strongest in high-ticket info-marketing and course/coaching businesses. AI-assisted cross-channel attribution, call tracking, and long-window attribution for high-AOV purchases. Reputation: powerful, thorough, expensive, and requiring implementation work.
Pricing: ~$499/mo entry → scales aggressively with ad spend, often reaching $2K–$10K+/mo at scale. No public standard tier list — per-account quotes.
Zeke starts one layer up. We don't try to out-attribute Hyros in info-marketing attribution; we turn your Meta + Google + Hyros-adjacent signals into evidence-backed briefs and reports your team can review quickly. Agencies running Hyros already have attribution; what they don't have is a reporting layer that ingests their internal playbook and cites it.
Pricing: Starter $197/mo · Growth $297/mo · Scale $497/mo
When to use which
Honest tradeoffs
Pick Zeke when…
- 01You run an agency with a book of 10–50 clients and need per-client ops + decision workflows.
- 02Your clients are lead-gen verticals (TRT, dental, home services) more than info-product funnels.
- 03You already have attribution (Meta + Google native, or a cheaper attribution tool) and the bottleneck is decisions, not tracking.
- 04You want decision-layer pricing that doesn't scale with spend — $197 covers 10 clients regardless of ad budget.
- 05You need a reusable internal strategy report - uploaded playbooks, source-backed context, cited reasoning - Hyros doesn't ship that.
Stick with Hyros when…
- 01You run a single high-ticket info/coaching business and need multi-session, long-window attribution as your primary pain.
- 02Phone-call tracking with AI session stitching is a core KPI — Hyros's specialty.
- 03You've already bought into the Hyros workflow and your team fluently reads its attribution view.
- 04You need the deepest cross-channel attribution math money can buy at one-account scale and are willing to pay for it.
Feature-by-feature
Side by side
Zeke AI
from $197/mo
Hyros
Attribution
Cross-channel / cross-session attribution
Call tracking + AI session stitching
Long-window (60–90 day) attribution
Works without a separate attribution tool
Hyros-compatible (imports Hyros signal)
Decision layer
Source-backed report recommendations
Per-client context layer (playbooks cited)
Approve / reject / auto-approve rules
Learns from reject-with-reason feedback
Cross-client rec prioritization
Agency workflows
Multi-client workspaces (10–50 clients)
White-label reports + reseller rights
Corporate rollup / region reporting
File ingestion + client context map
Operator chat over your uploaded playbook
Pricing & terms
Entry price
Includes at entry
Effective price at 10 clients
Price scales with ad spend
Implementation time
30-day money-back
Price locked forever
Verdict
Our take
If your single hardest problem is cross-session attribution for a high-ticket info business, Hyros is the category leader and worth the price. If you're an agency running a book of 10–50 performance clients where the bottleneck is ‟which action, which client, why today” — not attribution itself — Zeke is a 10× cheaper decision layer that complements whatever attribution you're already paying for. Many Hyros-using agencies run Zeke on top: keep Hyros for attribution, let Zeke turn the attribution signal into a daily queue.